Target Baseline Value
Name Description Performance Value
University Scorecard An Example of University Scorecard with Specific KPIs. Learn more about the best practices for building university scorecards and measuring various aspect of the performance with Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Based on article: http://www.bscdesigner.com/university-scorecard.htm 78.32%
Stakeholders interests 78.89% 9,349,008.33
Additional metrics 0
Percent of revenue from different sources
Research income per academic FTE
Staff cost as % of total cost
Dollars allocated per FTE enrollment
Align strategy with interests of the stakeholders 78.89% 9,349,008.33
Affordability 60% 47,000
Participation rate The percent of representation of certain group of population among students 83.33% 25
Funding, donations 93.33% 28,000,000
Create environment for the best academic staff 61.35% 61.35
Be well prepared for future challenges 84.49% 84.49
Learning and teaching 78.61% 78.61
Additional indicators 90% 38
Number of academic FTE
Completion rate per degree (Bachelor, PhD)
Student retention rate, % Measured from course to course 93.75% 75
Percent of foreigners among faculty members 69.23% 21
Percent of foreign students 88.24% 18
Research student number
Create environment for the best academic staff 61.35% 61.35
Satisfaction level (academic staff) 73% 73
Academic staff/student ratios How do you stand compared to other universities? Check out the data available here https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/news/top-100-universities-best-student-staff-ratio 25.71% 5.2
Academic staff with a doctorate 80% 24
Number of publications/citations per academic FTE Number of publications/citations according to Web of Science and Scopus 66.67% 18
Build systems that help to self-improve 74.43% 74.43
Excellent services and facilities 84.38% 84.38
Be well prepared for future challenges 84.49% 84.49
Time to degree Check out data by National Center for Education Statistics for benchmarking purposes: https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=569 83.33% 52
Learning outcomes 93.33% 78
Graduation rate The percent of the students who successfully completed their qualification 93.85% 61
Employment rate 92% 92
Salary after attending 59.93% 72,824
Providing professional and engaging academic experience 80% 80
Excellent services and facilities 84.38% 84.38
Internal services 79.6% 79.6
Build systems that help to self-improve 74.43% 74.43
Faculty staff engagement rate 87.1% 76
Active users of the performance measurement systems 73.68% 70
The percentage of returning problems 62.5% 5
Excellent services and facilities 84.38% 84.38
Equipment condition index 88.75% 71
Students and staff facilities satisfaction rate 80% 76
Providing professional and engaging academic experience 80% 80
Student satisfaction with academic support 80% 80
Building community 73.41% 73.41
Build relationship with alumni Build relationship with alumni to help new generations of students with their challenges. 73.41% 73.41
Alumni engagement index Alumnus participated in events / alumnus reached 75% 5
The number of events for alumni 66.67% 2
Reach ratio Alumnus reached via any contact mean vs. total number of living alumnus 78.57% 15