Name |
Description |
Performance |
Value |
University Scorecard |
An Example of University Scorecard with Specific KPIs. Learn more about the best practices for building university scorecards and measuring various aspect of the performance with Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Based on article: http://www.bscdesigner.com/university-scorecard.htm |
74.37%
|
|
Stakeholders interests |
|
39.44%
|
4,674,504.17
|
Additional metrics |
|
0%
|
0
|
Percent of revenue from different sources |
|
|
|
Research income per academic FTE |
|
|
|
Staff cost as % of total cost |
|
|
|
Dollars allocated per FTE enrollment |
|
|
|
Align strategy with interests of the stakeholders |
|
78.89%
|
9,349,008.33
|
Affordability |
|
60%
|
47,000
|
Participation rate |
The percent of representation of certain group of population among students |
83.33%
|
25
|
Funding, donations |
|
93.33%
|
28,000,000
|
Create environment for the best academic staff |
|
60.85%
|
|
Be well prepared for future challenges |
|
84.49%
|
|
Learning and teaching |
|
78.61%
|
78.61
|
Additional indicators |
|
90%
|
38
|
Number of academic FTE |
|
|
|
Completion rate per degree (Bachelor, PhD) |
|
|
|
Student retention rate, % |
Measured from course to course |
93.75%
|
75
|
Percent of foreigners among faculty members |
|
69.23%
|
21
|
Percent of foreign students |
|
88.24%
|
18
|
Research student number |
|
|
|
Create environment for the best academic staff |
|
61.35%
|
30.05
|
Satisfaction level (academic staff) |
|
73%
|
73
|
Academic staff/student ratios |
How do you stand compared to other universities? Check out the data available here https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/news/top-100-universities-best-student-staff-ratio |
25.71%
|
5.2
|
Academic staff with a doctorate |
|
80%
|
24
|
Number of publications/citations per academic FTE |
Number of publications/citations according to Web of Science and Scopus |
66.67%
|
18
|
Build systems that help to self-improve |
|
74.43%
|
|
Excellent services and facilities |
|
61.35%
|
|
Be well prepared for future challenges |
|
84.49%
|
14,621.4
|
Time to degree |
Check out data by National Center for Education Statistics for benchmarking purposes: https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=569 |
83.33%
|
52
|
Learning outcomes |
|
93.33%
|
78
|
Graduation rate |
The percent of the students who successfully completed their qualification |
93.85%
|
61
|
Employment rate |
|
92%
|
92
|
Salary after attending |
|
59.93%
|
72,824
|
Providing professional and engaging academic experience |
|
28%
|
|
Excellent services and facilities |
|
61.35%
|
|
Internal services |
|
79.6%
|
67.94
|
Build systems that help to self-improve |
|
74.43%
|
50.33
|
Faculty staff engagement rate |
|
87.1%
|
76
|
Active users of the performance measurement systems |
|
73.68%
|
70
|
The percentage of returning problems |
|
62.5%
|
5
|
Excellent services and facilities |
|
84.38%
|
73.5
|
Equipment condition index |
|
88.75%
|
71
|
Students and staff facilities satisfaction rate |
|
80%
|
76
|
Providing professional and engaging academic experience |
|
80%
|
80
|
Student satisfaction with academic support |
|
80%
|
80
|
Building community |
|
73.41%
|
7.33
|
Build relationship with alumni |
Build relationship with alumni to help new generations of students with their challenges. |
73.41%
|
7.33
|
Alumni engagement index |
Alumnus participated in events / alumnus reached |
75%
|
5
|
The number of events for alumni |
|
66.67%
|
2
|
Reach ratio |
Alumnus reached via any contact mean vs. total number of living alumnus |
78.57%
|
15
|